When Democracy Arrives in a Country Without Knowledge and Intellectuals
Author: Wari
Indramayu, Friday, July 17, 2026
Democracy is more than just ballot boxes and five-yearly elections. It is a system that demands that its citizens be able to read, ask questions, compare, and refuse to be lied to. The problem arises when the system lands in a country with a thin scientific foundation and a void in intellectual space.
1. Votes become commodities, not considerations
Without literacy and a tradition of critical thinking, politics turns into a market. What wins is not the best idea, but the loudest jingle, the most groceries, the most viral narrative. Voters don’t choose a vision. They choose the most familiar name, the figure they feel most connected to, or the team that attends the most events. As a result, public policy is born from short-term electoral calculations, not from long-term data and analysis.
2. Populism fills the intellectual vacuum
In a space devoid of substantive debate, simplification prevails. Complex problems like poverty, corruption, or the climate crisis are answered with three-word slogans. Anyone who dares to say “this is complicated and takes time” will lose to those who shout “I’ll solve it in 100 days.” Intellectuals, who should be balancing, providing early warning, and criticizing power, have no platform. The media prefers drama to discussion.
3. Institutions are fragile because they are not safeguarded
Democracy requires citizens who understand the constitution, understand the function of the House of Representatives (DPR), and understand the difference between criticism and insult. Without these, institutions can be easily hijacked. The law is blunt at the top, sharp at the bottom. Press freedom is attacked in the name of “maintaining unity.” Checks and balances are considered “disturbing stability.” Without an informed public, those in power are not afraid of correction.
4. Democracy survives, but its quality plummets
The country is still called democratic because it holds elections. But the substance is empty. What is happening is “procedural democracy without substantial democracy.” Turnout is high, but the quality of decisions is low. Campaign promises pile up, and accountability is minimal. Over time, people become disillusioned and say, “Democracy isn’t right for us.” In fact, it’s not democracy itself that’s unsuitable, but our readiness to live it.
So what’s the solution?
Democracy can’t wait 50 years for everyone to graduate. It must be built alongside education.
Schools and public spaces: encourage a culture of reading, debate, and asking questions from an early age. Coffee shops, mosques, and youth organizations can become informal democracy classrooms.
Intellectuals must come out of the woods: not just on campus. Write in simple language, be present in the media, and be a bridge between data and the people.
Media and platforms: give more space to explanatory content, not just provocative content.
Democracy without knowledge is like giving a sports car to someone who hasn’t learned to drive. It’s a great car, but it can be an accident. Knowledge and intellectuals aren’t elitism. They are the brakes, steering wheel, and mirrors to keep democracy from swerving.**
——
